The standard UK dissertation structure
UK universities vary in their specific requirements, but almost all empirical dissertations follow a standard six-chapter structure (sometimes seven, splitting results and analysis). Use this as your default unless your handbook says otherwise:
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- Methodology
- Results / Findings
- Discussion
- Conclusion
Word count guidance
| Level | Typical total | UG split | PG split |
| Undergraduate | 8,000–12,000 | Intro 10%, LR 25%, Meth 15%, Results 20%, Discussion 25%, Conclusion 5% | — |
| MSc / MA | 12,000–20,000 | — | Intro 10%, LR 20%, Meth 15%, Results 20%, Discussion 25%, Conclusion 10% |
| PhD thesis | 60,000–100,000 | — | Highly discipline-dependent |
Chapter 1 — Introduction
Sets up the whole dissertation. Your introduction should answer four questions: what is the topic, why does it matter, what is the research question (and any sub-questions), how is the dissertation structured. Don’t review literature here — that’s the next chapter. Aim for 8–12% of total word count.
Chapter 2 — Literature Review
Critical synthesis of what’s already known. Thematic structure beats chronological. Ends with a clear statement of the gap your research addresses. See our step-by-step lit review guide for the full process. Typically 20–30% of total word count.
Chapter 3 — Methodology
Three components, in this order:
- Philosophical position — positivist, interpretivist, critical realist. Brief but explicit.
- Research design & methods — survey, interviews, experimental, mixed-methods. Justify why this fits your question.
- Specifics — sampling strategy, instrument design, ethics, data analysis approach.
Your methodology is also where you address limitations of method (sample size, generalisability, etc). Markers love seeing methodological honesty.
Chapter 4 — Results / Findings
Present, don’t interpret. Tables, figures and descriptive stats for quantitative work; themes with verbatim quotes for qualitative. Save all interpretation for Discussion.
Useful structure for quantitative:
- Descriptive statistics for sample & key variables
- Inferential tests addressing each research question or hypothesis
- Effect sizes alongside p-values
- Assumption checks reported (or in appendix)
For qualitative:
- Brief reminder of analytic approach
- Themes presented with sub-themes
- Verbatim quotes with participant identifiers (anonymised)
- Thematic map / table summarising findings
Chapter 5 — Discussion
This is where you earn the upper marks. Three moves, in order:
- Interpret your findings — what do the results mean for your research question?
- Compare with the literature — agree with Smith (2021), disagree with Jones (2022), extend Patel (2023). Show where your work fits.
- Implications — theoretical, methodological, practical (for practitioners, policy makers, future researchers).
Limitations live in Discussion, not Methodology. Be honest. Three or four real limitations beats a list of ten weak ones.
Chapter 6 — Conclusion
Short. Restate the research question, summarise the answer, name the contribution, point to future research. Roughly 5–10% of the word count. No new arguments, no new citations.
Front matter & appendices
- Title page — university format
- Abstract — 150–300 words, structured (background, methods, results, conclusions)
- Acknowledgements — half a page
- Contents — generated automatically in Word / LaTeX
- List of figures and tables
- Abbreviations
- References / Bibliography — every cited source
- Appendices — interview schedule, survey instrument, ethics approval, full statistical output
Five things students underestimate
- Time on writing-up. Plan 30–40% of your dissertation time on writing, not data collection.
- The methodology chapter. Often the most-marked chapter. Don’t rush it.
- Discussion as work. This is the chapter that separates 2:1 from First. Plan an extra week for it.
- Abstract editing. Write the abstract LAST and edit it five times.
- Referencing consistency. Use Zotero, Mendeley or EndNote from day one. Manual referencing in a 12,000-word document is a disaster.
Related guides: How to write a literature review · Harvard referencing · Dissertation service